That statement is SOOOOOOO true!
This a.m. I was flipping through different channels on the tv to try and find something for background noise while I was cleaning. I came upon a show that I've seen advertised but never watched before ~ Work of Art ~ the next great artist so I decided to leave it on and see what it was about.
WELL, now it might be my being born/raised in the mid-west or it could have something to do with my art teachers in the past or just my own personal taste but I'm telling you 95% of what those people created in my book was NOT art!
Their inspiration for the challenge was motion ~ it was a modern dance show. I guess I'm just naive or something but a wooden structure getting an erection is NOT art...it's something I'd expect a 16 yr old male to create in shop class. Dropping a bucket of guts onto plastic sheeting is not art....it actually looked like one of our cows after she had a calf. Wrapping colored garden hose around a 5 gallon bucket isn't art or motion.... that's how we store our garden hose for the winter! WTHeck?!?
Have you seen the show?
What do you think?
I totally agree with you. I'm no art major, but I think art should come naturally not forced and under those conditioned. I think that's what they should challenge the artist on just their own natural talent.
ReplyDeleteI loved the show last year. So far I'm not sure about the artists. I will keep watching to see. The first episode showed their self portraits which was really interesting.
ReplyDeleteI've watched the show and yeah, it's pretty much a bunch of self-indulged college art majors acting out their personal problems. Occasionally someone creates something inspiring, but that may be accidental.
ReplyDeleteToo funny. I watched it for the first time this morning too! I was also looking for some background noise.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I wasn't impressed by their interpretation of motion. I loved how the artists were making fun of the one guy who did an ok job of interpreting the theme--the video that won the challenge. And really, the loser who just threw some icky organs or whatever that was onto a floor while video taping it--that's the best she could come up with? I get being inspired by a medical condition but yuck...not art or at least not good art.
I have not seen it, nor do I care to after that review!
ReplyDeleteHa ha...your commentary gave me a couple of laughs! I have to admit to having a fairly traditional idea of what art is as well, even though I was an art major in college!! One reason I didn't continue as an art major was probably because I lacked that vision that separated me from the more "creative" types. One of my closest friends was a performance artist (very successful) who went on to teach at Rutgers College and had shows in a number of countries etc. However, I could NOT understand or "get" any of her pieces! So, I left it to others to enjoy and just plugged away with what I enjoyed. Can't say that I'll check out this program myself, and I know exactly what you mean!
ReplyDeleteIt is strange how the concept of "art" has evolved over the years. It is subjective-look at the artist who caused a stir using urine and his own excrement to "paint" with but his "art" was shown in a high quality art museum in New York. The "artists" on this show are just a sign of the times-spoiled, pampered kids who self induldge in thinking they are artists. Sarah Jessica Parker should be held responsible for sponsering this drivil of a show. I will not watch again. How stupid that the winner was a man filming himelf spinning around so much he made himself sick. That is not art-that is a three year old's idea of fun.
ReplyDelete